Thursday, January 30, 2014

Tensions continue to rise in the Pacific over old news



A hostage crisis in Manila nearly 4 years ago is still sparking hostility between Hong Kong and the Philippines today. In August 2010, a crazed ex-police officer in Manila took control of a tour bus and killed 8 Hong Kong tourists in an effort to get back his job – the hostage crisis and standoff was televised and lasted almost 11 hours.  It sparked an international incident because Hong Kong officials disagreed with the manner in which Philippine officials handled the crisis and issued sanctions against the Philippines, “particularly, the requirement of visas for Philippine official and diplomatic passport holders which is usually given to government officials on official travel to Hong Kong.”  The sanctions were issued in October 2013 and reaffirmed this year when Hong Kong demanded an official apology from the Philippine Government and people. The Philippines issued a response to the demand for an apology, stating that, “We responded to this appeal without equivocation and in a most generous manner. Additional tokens of solidarity have therefore been pledged by Filipino people at the behest of the Philippine government.” The Philippine government has issued statements and compensation to the families that were affected by the hostage crisis and the families have all accepted the apology.  
            Logic follows that the issue should be swept under the rug and simply go down in history as a tragic event for everyone because it was a loss of life at the hands of a crazed man.  However, Hong Kong is demanding more.  Given the already heated relations in the Pacific, this just adds another straw to the camel’s back. Hopefully both nations can put their pride aside and get along.
This will most likely not lead to incident, but further irks an already rocky political climate in the Pacific. If it does lead to conflict, it could bode detrimental to the United States and others who have a heavily vested interest in the region.

By Christopher M. Vacek


No comments: