Putin has quietly signed a law that puts restrictions on
bloggers. If a blog has 3,000 hits daily, then it will be required to register
with the government in order not to stay anonymous. They will also be put under
the same “accuracy” laws as news outlets. The article talked a lot about
different countries and their own internet restrictions and laws, like China’s
ban on major western social media sites and reports of Venezuela blocking
online images for its users.
These types of censorships seem to come with their benefits
and hindrances. For example, the idea of putting accuracy laws on bloggers that
could influence many people seems, at first, like a good idea. It could help
keep people who are blantly trying to stir up conspiracies. On the other hand, the
idea of “accuracy” will be controlled and defined by a government—a government
that would want to keep secrets and Intel hidden.
I’m curious to know if states have interfered with internet freedoms.
If America’s foreign policy focuses on “spreading democracy” and protecting its
interests, has it gotten involved by trying to protect freedom of speech
through the ways of the internet. I know they’ve been working to develop social
media sites in countries to promote communication between citizens, but can the
help enhance voices that want to speak out?
Posted by Evy Lopez
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/07/world/europe/russia-quietly-tightens-reins-on-web-with-bloggers-law.html?_r=0
No comments:
Post a Comment