Chernobyl 2? Watching the world's aging power plants
In
a February 14, 2014 article on foxnews.com by Jeremy Kaplan , a serious concern for global security is
outlined. The concern is that the world’s
nuclear power plants are aging. The
danger of aging nuclear power plants is instability. Our technology has evolved
greatly in the past 4 decades, but most of the world’s nuclear power
plants are over 20 years old and are only predicted to last 30-40 years. This
is a serious concern for all nations of the world because of the potential for
meltdowns. The article presents an argument for action to form a regulatory
agency that works with governments to “professionalize security and to
facilitate minimum standards of competence and regulatory procedures.”
Furthermore, the article outlines that the United Nation’s International
Atomic Energy Agency acts as a nuclear watchdog at times, but that the IAEA
aids “member
countries in maintaining power plants to tease extra years from them while
preventing incidents.” This means that the IAEA is helping to extend the life of a
power plant, which could be bad if there are no minimum standards of competence
on nuclear power plant operations and upkeep.
The IAEA is doing a good job right now, but the real problem lies
in the near future when most of the world’s nuclear power plants become
dangerously close to incident.
In terms of foreign policy, this is a major issue because it
demands that countries work with each other to establish nuclear power plant
minimum standards so that no incidents like that of Chernobyl ever happen
again. And with the nuclear power “renaissance” currently
underway, more countries are expanding nuclear power as a source for energy,
the issue has supreme ripeness in the political realm and thus provides a
perfect opportunity for such measures to prevent catastrophe.
By Christopher M. Vacek
No comments:
Post a Comment