Recently,
a Mexican businessman was discovered to have funneled over 500,000 dollars into
a Super PAC in California. The Mexican national, Jose Susumo Azano Matsura, managed to finance multiple United
States political races through Super PACs and Shell companies. This is
the first that the Citizens United Supreme court decision has been exploited.
Of course, it seems that this will spur further inquiry regarding this
decision. The U.S. Attorney 's Office accused Campaign proprietor, Ravneet
Singh, and Ernesto Encina, former detective, of using this money to support
three democrat politicians and an attorney general.
The Citizens United decision allows an
unlimited amount of spending towards supporting political campaigns. Barack
Obama, in his 2010 State of the Union address, talked about the potential for
foreign investors and special interest groups to 'spend without limit in our
elections'. This is a problem because it undermines the democratic process. For
example, if a country wants to create a special trade price for oil with the
United States then they will invest as much as they can in order to have a
candidate who will support them. This candidate can use that money to spread
his campaign throughout the country. This candidate can user that money,
through backdoor agreements, to sway groups in their favor. So, in the end is
it a matter of popular policy making or private investments?
by Sergio Vargas
thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2014/02/11/feds_mexican_tycoon_used_super_pacs_to_influence_us_elections
by Sergio Vargas
thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2014/02/11/feds_mexican_tycoon_used_super_pacs_to_influence_us_elections
No comments:
Post a Comment