Given an unfortunate reality of child soldiers in many
conflicts around the world many countries are left clueless under international
law as to how to deal with them in war, creating a moral dilemma for both the
government and its soldiers. This article is pertaining to a ruling that was
passed on March 2nd in Canada that morally legalized the killing of
child soldiers, creating a moral justification for the perceived slaughter of ‘innocent’
children. This new ruling seeks to make an equal justification for soldiers who
are faced with killing children to instead equate it to killing an adult, in
hopes of reducing the emotional damage and suicides related to these traumatic
conflicts. Additionally, these new rules also implement suggestions on how to mitigate
or prevent the killing of child soldiers one example given is, “[the recommendation
of] shooting their adult commanders to shatter discipline and prompt the
youngsters to flee or surrender”. Finally, the article concludes by mentioning
the precarious quagmire created by passing rules on this topic, and its possible
acceptance by the British government.
The Economist: http://www.economist.com/news/americas/21719821-canada-writes-rules-troops-who-face-armed-nine-year-olds-when-it-ok-shoot-child
Nathaniel Dust
No comments:
Post a Comment